Percepción sobre la inclusión de chatbots de inteligencia artificial generativa en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje de docentes en formación dominicanos

Autores/as

Berki Yoselin Taveras

Instituto Superior de Formación Docente Salomé Ureña: Santo Domingo, América Centra. El Caribe, DO

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1462-3060

Descargas

Resumen

El uso del programa chatbots de inteligencia artificial generativa (IAG) está transformando el aprendizaje, la enseñanza y la investigación. Genera oportunidades y desafíos para estudiantes y docentes universitarios. El objetivo de este estudio consistió en analizar la percepción de docentes en formación de la República Dominicana sobre la inclusión de chatbots de IAG en su proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Un total de 278 docentes en formación respondieron voluntariamente un cuestionario en Google Forms, previamente validado, de 44 ítems sobre la percepción de beneficios, desventajas, usos y actitudes. En cuanto a los resultados, la mayoría de los estudiantes tiene cuenta de chatbots y la usan regularmente para realizar trabajos y evaluaciones. Perciben positivamente el uso de chatbots como complemento en su proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Consideran que los chatbots proporcionan asistencia personalizada e inmediata sobre cualquier tema, desarrolla sus habilidades y mejora su rendimiento. Además, perciben que estos recursos pueden afectar las habilidades de interacción social, generar dependencia y propiciar la deshonestidad y el fraude académico.

Palabras clave

chatbots, docentes en formación, formación docente, inteligencia artificial generativa, percepción

Publicado

2025-08-26

Número

Sección

Tecnología de la información y comunicación en ámbitos educativos

Cómo citar

Taveras, B. Y. (2025). Percepción sobre la inclusión de chatbots de inteligencia artificial generativa en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje de docentes en formación dominicanos. Congreso Caribeño De Investigación Educativa, 5, 313–319. Recuperado a partir de https://congresos.isfodosu.edu.do/index.php/ccie/article/view/1269

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2025 Berki Yoselin Taveras

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Bíró, G. (2014). Didactics 2.0: A pedagogical analysis of gamification theory from a comparative perspective with a special view to the components of learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 148-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.027

Bonsu, E., & Baffour-Koduah, D. (2023). From the Consumers’ Side: Determining Students’ Perception and Intention to Use ChatGPT in Ghanaian Higher Education. Journal of Education, Society & Multiculturalism, 4(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.2478/jesm-2023-0001

Chan, C. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3

Chan, C., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. arXiv, 1-18. http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00290

Chan, C., & Lee, K. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3

Chan, C., & Zhou, W. (2023). Deconstructing Student Perceptions of Generative AI (GenAI) through an Expectancy Value Theory (EVT)-based Instrument. arXiv. https://doi.org/https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2023arXiv230501186Y/doi:10.48550/arXiv.2305.01186

Cotton, D., Cotton, P., & Shipway, J. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Dixon, S. (2023). Don’ t panic (yet): The implications of ChatGPT for Education Studies in the UK. Educational Futures, 14(1), 96-116. https://newman.repository.guildhe.ac.uk/id/eprint/17349/1/NU0166.pdf

Filipec, O., & Woithe, J. (2023). Understanding the Adoption, Perception, and Learning Impact of ChatGPT in Higher Education. A qualitative exploratory case study analyzing students’ perspectives and experiences with the AI-based large language model. Jönköping University.

Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. TJournal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 5(1), 57-63.

Herrera-Ortiz, J., Peña-Avilés, J., & Moreno-Morán, D. (2024). La inteligencia artificial y su impacto en la comunicación: recorrido y perspectivas. TELOS: Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Ciencias Sociales, 26(1), 278-296.

Ibrahim, H., Liu, F., Asim, R., Battu, B., Benabderrahmane, S., Alhafni, B., Adnan, W., Alhanai, T., AlShebli, B., Baghdadi, R., Bélanger, J., Beretta, E., Celik, K., Chaqfeh, M., Daqaq, M., Bernoussi, Z., Fougnie, D., de Soto, B., Gandolfi, A., … Zaki, Y. (2023). Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial intelligence across 32 university courses. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 12187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38964-3

Imran, A., & Lashari, A. (2023). Exploring the World of Artificial Intelligence: The Perception of the University Students about ChatGPT for Academic Purpose. Global Social Sciences Review, 8(I), 375-384. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2023(viii-i).34

Jarrah, A., Wardat, Y., & Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4), e202346. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13572

Khalil, M., & Er, E. (2023). Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detection. arXiv, 1-13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.04335

Lievens, J. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Tool or Trickery? Education and New Developments, 2, 645-647. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6937-8.ch014

Limna, P., Kraiwanit, T., Jangjarat, K., Klayklung, P., & Chocksathaporn, P. (2023). The use of ChatGPT in the digital era: Perspectives on chatbot implementation. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.32

Merleau-Ponty, M., (2012). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.

Mogavi, R., Deng, C., Kim, J., Zhou, P., Kwon, Y., Metwally, A., Tlili, A., Bassanelli, S., Bucchiarone, A., Gujar, S., Nacke, L., & Hui, P. (2023).

Exploring User Perspectives on ChatGPT: Applications, Perceptions, and Implications for AI-Integrated Education. arXiv, 1-23. http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.13114

Moulding, L., Stewart, P., & Dunmeyer, M. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ sense of efficacy: Relationship to academic ability, student teaching placement characteristics, and mentor support. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.03.007

Ngo, T. (2023). The Perception by University Students of the Use of ChatGPT in Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(17), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019

Pavlik, J. (2023). Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 78(1), 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577

Peres, R., Schreier, M., Schweidel, D., & Sorescu, A. (2023). On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(2), 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.03.001

Qadir, J. (2023). Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 2023-May. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121

Raman, R., Mandal, S., Das, P., Kaur, T., & Nedungadi, P. (2023). University students as early adopters of ChatGPT: Innovation Diffusion Study. Research Square, 1-32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2734142/v1

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Shoufan, A. (2023). Exploring Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT: Thematic Analysis and Follow-Up Survey. IEEE Access, 11(3), 38805-38818. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3268224

Stănescu, G. (2023). the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Journalism. Adverse Effects Vs. Benefits. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 10(1), 258-262. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8151135

Sundar, S., & Liao, M. (2023). Calling BS on ChatGPT: Reflections on AI as a Communication Source. Journalism and Communication Monographs, 25(2), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/15226379231167135

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Urban, M., & Lukavsky, J. (2023). Can ChatGPT Improve Creative Problem-Solving Performance in University Students? PsyArXiv, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9z2tc

Wang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2023). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Generative AI for Art Designing Among Chinese Generation Z: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. IEEE Access, 11, 143272-143284. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3342055

Yzquierdo-Herrera, R., & Morales-Oliva, A. (2023). Retos menos evidentes en la integración de la inteligencia artificial en el entorno universitario. UCE Ciencia. Revista de Postgrado, 11(2), 1-8. http://uceciencia.edu.do/index.php/OJS/article/view/328/302